Join me for MinistryCOM 2008 - Living On The Edge - September 18-19, 2008 in Oklahoma City

« Please Don’t Dis Your Sister Church! | Home | Make Vaction Bible School Follow-up a Priority! »

Diary of an Expensive Church Planting Marketing Outreach Flop

By chris | June 26, 2008

A church planting team launched a new church in their community the church is called “Family Worship Center” A family oriented church. The team decided to “pull out all the stops”. They allocated $20,000 dollars for a marketing budget to announce the launch of their new church.

They used the following media:

The Marketing Outreach was a Flop

The church planting team was very unhappy when they spent all that money and only had two visitors to their new church launch. The Planter pastor became so discouraged and frustrated he wanted to quit. How could they spend all that money on marketing and see such small results?

He called his team together and they talked and decided that marketing doesn’t work .One of the team members who had been against the marketing campaign spoke up and said, “See, I like I said five weeks ago when we started planning this marketing, marketing is not God’s will. God won’t bless us if we use Satan’s ways!” The team huddled together and prayed to God asking Him to forgive them for being so worldly

What went wrong?

Areas to think about when Planning a Marketing Campaign

Audience: When you buy media you are not buying media per se, you are buying eyes and ears of particular people. Audience comes first in media. When you have done your homework, you know who your audience is and you find the media channels that reach them best. When you don’t have a particular audience in mind, media sales people have a way of convincing you their media is the best way to reach people. Know the people you want to reach!

Use of Media: Think about media as the tools you use to travel to the audience you want to reach. It’s like traveling in a train. Say you wanted to get to New York City by train. You can’t get on just any train to get to New York. Imagine someone saying after failing to get to New York by train, “I tried train travel, but trains can’t get you to New York. The Devil wants to keep me outta NYC!” The fact is trains can get you to New York, if you take the right trains. You have to take a train that is going to New York. In the same way, you need the right media “vehicle” to get to your audience.

Reach and Frequency: In media you can’t get to the audience in one trip. You have to reach them several times before the will notice you. Generally it takes 8-12 exposures to a message in these days, before people start to notice. You need to “reach” the right audience enough times “frequency” to get their attention. In the example above the church planters reached people one time in the mail box and one time in the news paper. And because they lacked planning, they have no way of knowing how many times they reached the same audience, or even if they reached the people they were most likely to minister to effectively even once.

Topics: Uncategorized |

3 Responses to “Diary of an Expensive Church Planting Marketing Outreach Flop”

  1. Mark Bennardo Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 10:48 am

    Great post, Chris. I especially loved the part about trying to get to NY by train. “Trains can’t get you to NY” is classic.

    I experienced the same thing 15-20 years ago when churches were first starting to do contemporary or seeker services. They’d do poor planning or execution and wouldn’t develop a core group or basic strategies to support the new service. Then when things would fizzle, they’d say, “See, seeker services don’t work around here”, or “The people have spoken, they only like traditional services”. They might as well have said, “That train can’t reach seekers”.

    Thanks for your insights!

  2. chris Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 10:52 am

    Thanks Mark! Yeah I think trains can’t get you to some places in Montana–but everywhere else is covered :-)

  3. James E Johnson Says:
    June 26th, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    And what was the compelling response generating benefit proposition?
    And what was the immediate benefit to the person who would respond?
    And what response channels were presented on the postcard?
    And what “Previously demonstrated behavior” and “individual or household characteristics” were used to select the 30,000?
    Why 30,000?
    What was the expected result?

Comments